Will ban on finning save the shark?

New Delhi: “It really tastes of nothing,” superstar culinary specialist Gordon Ramsay once told his television crowd while tasting some shark blade soup at a Taiwanese restaurant. “It’s similar to having plain glass noodles.” Millions of individuals clearly don’t think so.

Alt Text: Shark Finning Ban - Saving the sharks.
Image by PIRO from Pixabay

The interest for the pricey shark blade soup, a delicacy of the Cantonese cooking, has expanded enormously among the developing Chinese working class avid to parade their freshly discovered thriving. For the sharks, it implies a horrifying demise. Since its meat is not exceptionally esteemed, the shark is tossed go into the ocean after its blades are hacked off, letting the fish sink to the bottom to kick the bucket excruciatingly.

Upwards of 73-100 million sharks are executed consistently to sustain the $360 billion blade industry, as indicated by a report distributed on 30 May in Oryx, an international diary on conservation. Such overfishing debilitates the survival of the top marine predator. After an objection by conservationists, China in December banned shark blade soup and fledgling’s home soup from authority banquets, apparently to decrease government use. Shockingly India, where shark balances are not a mainstream culinary decision, is the second biggest shark-discovering nation after Indonesia, as per TRAFFIC, an organization that monitors natural life exchange.

No less than 74,000 tons of sharks are gotten by the nation’s anglers,

which with Indonesia represented 20% of the worldwide get somewhere around 2002 and 2011, the untamed life exchange monitoring system says. Indian waters are home to exactly 60 mixtures of sharks among the 465 discovered universally. Out of these only four—Whale shark, Ganges shark, Pondicherry Shark and Speartooth shark—are protected under the natural life protection law. Like the tiger ashore, sharks are a keystone species in the seas. The random butchering of the zenith predator of the oceans may hold grave consequences for the marine biological community.

A July 2001 ban on shark chasing by the environment service was brief after strong dissents from angling groups. Presently, 65 nations have banned finning, however much of the time laws, guidelines and conservation measures stay feeble and uncertain. A hefty portion of them stay open to distinctive interpretations. “Each nation with a coastline fares shark balances to Hong Kong and China,” says Shelley Clarke, fisheries researcher and part of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s (IUCN) shark expert gathering.

“Despite the fact that the interest for balances has developed through the years,

the supply has dwindled due to unsustainable angling practices.” Will the bar on finning work in India? The late lead on making it a wrongdoing has officially drawn challenges. While cheering the environment service’s action, Vincent Jain, CEO of Association of Deep Sea Going Artisanal Fishermen, says: “Since 2005, there has been no shark finning by artisanal anglers. Only trawlers are occupied with this pitiless practice.” Jain is fearful that if monitoring and actualizing officers are not knowledgeable with the present ban and its contents, it may prompt unnecessary complication. Other masters impart his concern.

It will be challenging to implement the ban on the ground, primarily due to the lack of awareness among authorities and the fishing community, explains Shekhar Niraj, head of Traffic India. Additionally, the issue of foreign fishing vessels illegally entering Indian waters to catch sharks further complicates the situation, as Niraj, former director of the Gulf of Mannar Marine National Park, has experienced firsthand during wildlife seizures.

Supporting Niraj’s viewpoint, conservationist and filmmaker Himanshu Malhotra,

known for his award-winning documentary “Diminishing Resources” (2006) that exposed the horrific practice of shark-finning at sea, agrees that ground realities differ, and a centralized notification may not effectively address the issue.

Furthermore, there is an uncomfortable truth surrounding the trade of shark fins in India. Despite being the second-largest catcher of sharks according to TRAFFIC data, India does not rank among the leading exporters of shark fins. The top exporting countries are Spain, Singapore, Taiwan, and Indonesia, primarily shipping to Hong Kong, the world’s largest market. In the fiscal year 2012-13, India exported 91 tons of dried shark fins worth $6.37 million, with 76 tons worth $4.9 million sent to China, as reported by the Marine Products Export Development Authority.

Samir Sinha, former head of TRAFFIC India,

stresses the need for more comprehensive data on shark species caught and their quantities to assess the annual average of 74,000 tons. Sinha finds it astonishing that the second-largest shark catcher globally is not among the top exporters of shark fins, the most prized trade commodity. He raises concerns about the possibility of illegal exports. The report states that India exports almost all of its produced shark fins in a predominantly informal and unregulated sector, suggesting that official trade data significantly underestimate the actual shark fin exports.

In conclusion, the challenges of implementing the ban on shark fins in India are multifaceted, encompassing issues of awareness, livelihoods, illegal fishing, and international trade. The complexities of the situation require a comprehensive approach that addresses both local and global aspects of shark conservation.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top
%d bloggers like this: